Tea: Mango Strawberry with milk and honey
Music: Don Henley, "Not Enough Love in the World"
Time: Night.
A few weeks ago, I read what appeared to be a badly reported newspaper review of an art show at a local gallery. (No names in this one. I deal with parties on all sides, you see.)
The show is controversial, thought-provoking and a fascinating combination of reverent and edgy -- and yet there was no mention of the personal views the artist holds on the subject at the heart of his works.
I used the word "weak" to describe the review. "Sloppy," too -- and, by extension, I thought of the writer as also possessing those (dubious) qualities.
Then, today -- while talking to the director of the gallery in question -- I found out I was wrong.
Oh, the story as presented was weak -- but only because an editor cut out two-thirds of it, something that left the writer heartsick and frantically calling people to explain.
And suddenly, I was the one who hadn't done his legwork.
It's a nasty thing, presumption -- especially given that I've had editors cut out key points or even insert mistakes into pieces I've written. (I should not here that I have had far more good editors than bad.)
I used to joke that it was better to assume the worst about people, because pleasant surprises are always better than unpleasant ones. I think it's time to scrap that attitude, even in jest. This is another case where it hasn't served me well.
Saturday, December 13, 2008
Not Every Story Gives the Whole Picture
Labels:
Arts,
bad editing,
caffeine,
presumption,
tea,
unpleasant surprises,
writing
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment